Build a LiFePO4 Battery Line Under Your Own Brand
Two routes: brand an existing certified platform, or engineer a new one. This page sets out which route fits your situation, what each level of customisation costs in MOQ, tooling and weeks, and what we will not agree to do.
- Three customisation tiers with stated cost and time impact
- A published list of what we will not customise
- Batch consistency and change control in writing
- Tooling, design and IP ownership stated before contract
Platforms available for private label
12.8 V / 25.6 V / 51.2 V / 256 V · portable · containerised
Eight questions, answered on the page rather than after an enquiry
- Which route fits — OEM branding or ODM development
- What changes at each customisation tier, and what it costs
- What drives MOQ, tooling and lead time
- How a custom configuration is validated before mass production
- How batch five is kept identical to batch one
- Who owns the tooling, the design and the certification
- Which documents are issued, for which market
- What happens when a unit fails at your customer's site
OEM or ODM — the difference is who owns the engineering
Brand an existing platform
- Fastest route to market
- Existing certification to build on
- Lower MOQ and no tooling investment
- Differentiation through brand, channel and service
Best when you are entering the category, testing a market, or competing on brand and distribution rather than on hardware.
Engineer a new product
- Genuine hardware differentiation
- Specification you own and control
- Tooling and testing investment required
- Longer development and certification timeline
Best when the market has a requirement the catalogue cannot meet, and the volume justifies amortising development.
| OEM — branding a platform | ODM — new development | |
|---|---|---|
| Design ownership | SafeCloud platform | Jointly defined, scope agreed in contract |
| Typical time to first shipment | Weeks | Months |
| Tooling investment | None to minimal | Required where a new enclosure is involved |
| Certification | Builds on existing platform evidence | New testing against the new configuration |
| MOQ | Baseline | Higher — development has to be amortised |
| Change flexibility later | High — swap platform or capacity | Lower — locked once tooled and tested |
| Differentiation | Brand, channel, service, support | Hardware, form factor, electrical envelope |
Every change has a price in MOQ, tooling and weeks
Identity
- Logo, label and model code
- Enclosure colour within existing finishes
- Carton, manual and quick-start guide
- Retail or trade packaging design
MOQ · Baseline
Lead time · Add artwork approval to standard production
Tooling · None
Re-testing · Not required — configuration unchanged
Configuration
- Capacity and cell configuration
- BMS thresholds and protection values
- Communication protocol and inverter matching
- Terminal, connector and cable format
- Bluetooth, display, app and monitoring options
MOQ · Moderate increase over baseline
Lead time · Longer — sampling and functional validation added
Tooling · None to minimal
Re-testing · Partial — where the change touches a tested parameter
Engineering
- New enclosure or form factor
- New BMS firmware or control logic
- Non-standard cell format or supplier
- New thermal or mechanical design
- Full certification against the new configuration
MOQ · Significantly higher — development is amortised
Lead time · Months — design, tooling, sampling, testing
Tooling · Required, quoted separately as a one-time cost
Re-testing · Full — the new configuration is a new product
How we quote it. Tooling is a one-time cost and we say so on the quotation. Testing is a one-time cost. Cell and component cost is per unit and moves with volume. You should be able to see which is which on any quotation you receive — from us or from anyone else. If a supplier bundles all of it into a single unit price, you cannot tell what returns when the programme scales.
What we will customise — and what we will not
We will customise
- Voltage, capacity and cell configuration
- BMS protection thresholds and balancing behaviour
- CAN / RS485 / RS232 protocol and inverter matching
- Continuous and peak current rating within platform limits
- Terminal type, position and cable lug format
- Enclosure format, colour, finish and ingress rating
- Bluetooth, LCD display, app and monitoring modules
- Self-heating and low-temperature charge behaviour
- Logo, label, manual, carton, pallet and export packaging
- Documentation package for the destination market
We will not
- Print a certification mark the product does not hold
- Issue documentation naming a model that was not tested
- Quote a cycle life figure without its test conditions
- Ship a configuration that has not passed functional validation
- Substitute a cell source mid-programme without written notice
- Agree a current rating the BMS build cannot sustain
- Supply an indoor-rated enclosure for an outdoor installation
- Commit to a lead time before cell availability is confirmed
Seven stages from specification to repeat production
Requirement review
Owner: You + engineering
Engineering proposal
Owner: SafeCloud engineering
Quotation and tier confirmation
Owner: Commercial
Sample build and validation
Owner: SafeCloud QC
Approval and specification lock
Owner: You
Mass production
Owner: SafeCloud production
Shipment and ongoing support
Owner: Both
Customisation without validation is label printing with risk attached
- Cell sorting by measured capacity and internal resistance before assembly
- Electrical performance against the agreed specification, not the platform default
- Protection function test at every configured threshold
- Communication test against the target inverter or PCS model
- Aging cycle under the defined charge and discharge profile
- Mechanical fit and enclosure check against the approved drawing
- Label, firmware, accessory and carton-mark verification
The real private-label risk is batch five, not batch one
Locked at approval
- Cell model and cell manufacturer
- BMS hardware and firmware version
- Enclosure drawing and finish
- Terminal, connector and harness
- Label artwork and carton marks
Notified before it changes
- Any cell source substitution
- Any BMS firmware revision
- Any component obsolescence
- Any process change affecting the spec
- Any certification scope change
Traceable per batch
- Production batch and date code
- Cell batch reference
- Aging and outgoing test records
- Firmware version shipped
- Shipment and packing documentation
Who owns the tooling, the design and the certificate
| Item | Default position | Negotiable |
|---|---|---|
| Your brand, logo and artwork | Yours, entirely | Not applicable |
| Your packaging and manual design | Yours, entirely | Not applicable |
| Existing SafeCloud platform design | Ours | No |
| Tooling you paid for | Yours on full payment; held and maintained by us | Transfer terms, on request |
| Configuration developed for your programme | Defined in the contract | Yes — agree before development |
| Certification issued in your name | Yours | Not applicable |
| Certification issued in ours | Ours; usable by you as supporting evidence | Scope, on request |
| Market or channel exclusivity | Not granted by default | Yes — against volume commitment |
What you receive, and for which market
| Destination | Typically required beyond transport documents |
|---|---|
| Every shipment | UN38.3 Test Summary, SDS, dangerous goods packaging for sea freight |
| European Union | CE Declaration of Conformity; EU Battery Regulation obligations; IEC 62619 / 63056 evidence commonly requested |
| United Kingdom | UKCA marking with separate conformity assessment |
| United States / Canada | UL 1973 and UL 9540 listing for permitted installations; UL 9540A data increasingly requested |
| Australia / New Zealand | AS/NZS 5139 installation context; CEC listing decisive for the residential channel |
| South Africa | NRCS Letter of Authority for regulated products |
What happens when a unit fails at your customer's site
- Warranty term, retention threshold and throughput basis agreed in contract
- Batch traceability so a failure can be tied to a production run
- Diagnostic route — BMS data readout and fault code reference
- RMA process with a defined target turnaround
- Spare-part and replacement-unit policy
- Technical support to your team, not to your end customers
- Change notification for the life of the programme
OEM and ODM programme questions
It depends on the tier. Tier 1 identity work sits at the platform baseline because nothing electrical changes. Tier 2 configuration raises it moderately. Tier 3 engineering raises it significantly because development and testing have to be amortised across the order. Send the platform, the tier and your annual forecast and we will quote MOQ, tooling and lead time together — quoting one without the others is meaningless.
Tier 1 adds artwork approval to standard production lead time. Tier 2 adds sampling and functional validation. Tier 3 runs to months because design, tooling, sampling and certification testing are sequential. The variable that moves most is cell availability, which is why we do not commit to a date before it is confirmed.
Mostly cell procurement and change management, not assembly. Assembly capacity is rarely the constraint. Ask any supplier how many cell sources are approved for your platform and what happens if one is constrained — the answer tells you how much their date is worth.
Tooling applies at Tier 3 where a new enclosure is involved, and it is quoted as a separate one-time line item rather than buried in the unit price. Tooling you pay for in full is yours; we hold and maintain it. Transfer terms can be agreed on request.
Certification in your name is possible and the certificate is then yours. Where testing is held in ours, you can use it as supporting evidence but the certificate remains ours. Which route makes sense depends on the market and on whether you intend to move production later — worth deciding early, because it is awkward to change afterwards.
Not by default, and we would rather say so than imply otherwise. Exclusivity is negotiable against a volume commitment and is easiest to structure at the start of a programme. Raise it in the first conversation rather than after a platform is already selling in your market.
The configuration is frozen at sample approval and becomes the production reference. Cell model, cell manufacturer, BMS hardware and firmware version, enclosure drawing and terminal format are all locked. Any change to those is notified before it happens, not discovered afterwards. Each batch carries a date code and cell batch reference so a field issue can be traced to a production run.
Platform or application, target voltage and capacity, continuous and peak current, communication requirement and target inverter or PCS model, enclosure and ingress requirement, destination markets and certification scope, customisation scope, trial quantity and expected annual volume. The more of that arrives with the first email, the faster the first quotation is worth reading.
